EVALUATION OF INTERNATIONAL PRACTICES IN THE USE OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS IN ATTRACTING INVESTMENTS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/city-development.2026.1-12

Keywords:

public-private partnership, PPP, investment attraction, state investment policy, infrastructure projects, Value for Money (VfM), ), Public Sector Comparator (PSC), fiscal risks, European PPP market, institutional support

Abstract

The article examines foreign experience in attracting investment through public-private partnership (PPP) as an important instrument of state investment policy. It is substantiated that, in international practice, PPP is not only a form of financing infrastructure projects, but also a comprehensive mechanism for combining public and private resources to create and modernize socially significant infrastructure. It is determined that the effectiveness of PPP depends on the quality of the legal and regulatory environment, the institutional capacity of the state, the use of efficiency assessment tools (VfM, PSC), transparency of procedures, appropriate risk allocation, and fiscal control. The study analyzes the development trends of the global PPP market in 2022-2024. It has been established that its dynamics were characterized by a decline in the number of deals under the influence of macroeconomic and geopolitical instability; however, PPP retained its importance as a key mechanism for implementing infrastructure and socially significant projects. Considerable regional variability of the market was identified: in 2024, the role of Europe increased, while the shares of Asia, North America, and Latin America declined. Particular attention is paid to the European PPP market in 2024, which was characterized by a decrease in the aggregate value of deals, a reduction in the average transaction size, an increase in the share of smaller projects, and a stronger role of government-paid models based on availability payments. It is shown that, alongside the dominance of transport infrastructure, the importance of educational, healthcare, environmental, digital, and коммунal projects is increasing. The author concludes that the modern PPP market is evolving toward a more flexible, diversified, and risk-sensitive model. For Ukraine, the need to develop its own institutionally coordinated PPP system is substantiated, capable of ensuring recovery, modernization, and long-term attraction of private capital.

References

World Bank Group. Public-Private Partnerships Reference Guide, Version 3.0. Washington, DC: World Bank. 2017. URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/29052

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Recommendation of the Council on Principles for Public Governance of Public-Private Partnerships. Paris: OECD. 2012. URL: https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0392

International Monetary Fund (IMF). Understanding Fiscal Costs and Fiscal Risks from Public-Private Partnerships. Washington, DC: IMF. 2019. URL: https://infrastructuregovern.imf.org/content/dam/PIMA/Forum/IGEUR/Activities/CEF_nov2019/Day3/Understanding%20Fiscal%20Costs%20and%20Fiscal%20Risks%20from%20PPPs.pdf

Delmon J., Delmon V.R. International Project Finance and Public-Private Partnerships: A Legal Guide to Key Growth Markets. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International. 2012. URL: https://ppp.worldbank.org/library/international-project-finance-and-public-private-partnerships-legal-guide-key-growth-markets-2013

European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC). The Guide to Guidance: How to Prepare, Procure and Deliver PPP Projects. Luxembourg: European Investment Bank. 2011. URL: https://ppp.worldbank.org/library/epec-guide-guidance-how-prepare-procure-and-deliver-ppp-projects

National PPP policy documents and reviews in EU countries. (n.d.). Materials on central PPP units, institutional functions, and best practices.

International Monetary Fund (IMF); World Bank. (n.d.). Materials on budget scoring, guarantees and contingent liabilities in public-private partnerships.

World Bank Group. Benchmarking Public-Private Partnerships Procurement 2017. Washington, DC: World Bank. 2017. URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/6cd437b1-084b-5a83-831e-ffb8a3d05f36

InfraPPP. (n.d.). InfraPPP World. URL: https://www.infrapppworld.com/

Верховна Рада України. (n.d.). Аналітичний документ [PDF]. URL: https://research.rada.gov.ua/uploads/documents/33766.pdf

European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC). Review of the European Public-Private Partnership Market in 2024. European Investment Bank Group. 2025. URL: https://www.eib.org/attachments/lucalli/20250010_epec_market_update_2024_en.pdf

World Bank Group. (2017). Public-Private Partnerships Reference Guide, Version 3.0. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/29052

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2012). Recommendation of the Council on Principles for Public Governance of Public-Private Partnerships. Paris: OECD. Available at: https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0392

International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2019). Understanding Fiscal Costs and Fiscal Risks from Public-Private Partnerships. Washington, DC: IMF. Available at: https://infrastructuregovern.imf.org/content/dam/PIMA/Forum/IGEUR/Activities/CEF_nov2019/Day3/Understanding%20Fiscal%20Costs%20and%20Fiscal%20Risks%20from%20PPPs.pdf

Delmon J., Delmon V.R. (2012). International Project Finance and Public-Private Partnerships: A Legal Guide to Key Growth Markets. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International. Available at: https://ppp.worldbank.org/library/international-project-finance-and-public-private-partnerships-legal-guide-key-growth-markets-2013

European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC). (2011). The Guide to Guidance: How to Prepare, Procure and Deliver PPP Projects. Luxembourg: European Investment Bank. Available at: https://ppp.worldbank.org/library/epec-guide-guidance-how-prepare-procure-and-deliver-ppp-projects

National PPP policy documents and reviews in EU countries. (n.d.). Materials on central PPP units, institutional functions, and best practices.

International Monetary Fund (IMF); World Bank. (n.d.). Materials on budget scoring, guarantees and contingent liabilities in public-private partnerships.

World Bank Group. (2017). Benchmarking Public-Private Partnerships Procurement 2017. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/6cd437b1-084b-5a83-831e-ffb8a3d05f36

InfraPPP. (n.d.). InfraPPP World. Available at: https://www.infrapppworld.com/

Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. (n.d.). Analitychnyi dokument [PDF]. Available at: https://research.rada.gov.ua/uploads/documents/33766.pdf

European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC). (2025). Review of the European Public-Private Partnership Market in 2024. European Investment Bank Group. Available at: https://www.eib.org/attachments/lucalli/20250010_epec_market_update_2024_en.pdf

Published

2026-03-09

How to Cite

Malskyy, O. (2026). EVALUATION OF INTERNATIONAL PRACTICES IN THE USE OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS IN ATTRACTING INVESTMENTS. CITY DEVELOPMENT, (1 (09), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.32782/city-development.2026.1-12

Issue

Section

Статті