SCIENTIFIC APPROACHES TO ASSESSING THE LEVEL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES IN UKRAINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/city-development.2026.2-3Keywords:
sustainable development, territorial community, indicators, sustainable development goals, evaluation, strategic managementAbstract
The article identifies the theoretical and methodological foundations for assessing the level of sustainable development of territorial communities in Ukraine and substantiates the necessity of forming a comprehensive system of indicators in the context of decentralization and European integration processes. It is proven that the absence of a unified and practically applicable assessment toolkit significantly complicates strategic management at the local level and reduces the effectiveness of managerial decision-making. The study emphasizes the importance of localizing the Sustainable Development Goals and adapting international approaches to national conditions, taking into account the specific features of community development. The structure of the assessment system, which includes economic, social, environmental, and institutional components, is substantiated, and the key principles of its formation, including relevance, balance, accessibility, comparability, and adaptability, are defined. It is noted that at present, until the emergence of full-fledged local statistics, the set of such indicators will necessarily have a compromise nature, combining the requirements for reflecting aspects of sustainable development with the real availability of statistical data and other information on community activities. It is argued that a well-designed system of indicators should ensure both the comparability of results across communities and the flexibility needed to reflect local specificities and priorities. Furthermore, the proposed approach to indicator development enables a balanced combination of standardized and variable metrics, which enhances the analytical value of the assessment results. The findings highlight that the implementation of such a system contributes to improving the quality of strategic planning, strengthening institutional capacity, ensuring transparency and accountability of local authorities, and fostering evidence-based policy-making for sustainable community development. In addition, the practical applicability of the proposed framework is emphasized as a basis for continuous monitoring and timely adjustment of development strategies.
References
Варламова М. Л., Іщук Ю. А. Підходи до оцінки сталого розвитку країн. Modern Economics. 2023. № 42. С. 12-18.
Зайцева Л. О. Класифікація індикаторів оцінки сталого розвитку. Вчені записки ТНУ імені В. І. Вернадського. Серія: Економіка і управління. 2020. Том 31 (70). № 4. С. 75-80.
Хаустова В. Є., Омаров Ш. А. Концепція сталого розвитку як парадигма розвитку суспільства. Проблеми економіки. 2018. № 1 (35). С. 265-273.
Коблянська І. Г. Інтегральна оцінка ефективності еколого-економічних процесів у регіональній площині з позицій сталого розвитку. Економіка та суспільство. 2023. № 56. URL: https://economyandsociety.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/2966
Степанова О. В., Степанова Н. С. Методичний підхід до визначення системи цілей та оцінки рівня сталого розвитку регіонів. БізнесІнформ. 2023. № 5. С. 59-66.
Grijelmo M., Etxebarria M., Barona A., Rojo N., S´anchez-Fuente F. Sustainable Development Goals at regional level: Case study for enhancing performance assessment. Environmental Development. 2026. № 57. 101355.
Kassymova S., Mustafayev K., Kabiyeva A. Development of an ecological-economic assessment system for the sustainable development of regions in Kazakhstan. Economics. 2025. № 13(4), P. 339-361.
Kauling M. F., Fernandes V., Limont M., Dziedzic M. Sustainable territorial development index for assessment of metropolitan regions. Sustainable Futures. 2025. № 10. 101212.
Bai L., Chen Y., Cui Y., Feng C., Wu C., Ma B., Zhao W., Duan C., Wang W. Evaluating the Sustainable Development Level of Local Communities Within Hunan Nanshan National Park, China. Land. 2025. № 14, 1749. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1749.
Moschen S. A., Macke J., Bebber S., Benetti Correa da Silva M. Sustainable development of communities: ISO 37120 and UN goals. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2019. № 20(5). P. 887–900.
Huang R., Huang Q., Pradhan P., Wang Y., Hubacek K. Assessment of the sustainable development status of districts and counties in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration. Ecological Modelling. 2025. Vol. 507. 111191. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304380025001760.
Горбата Л. П. Пріоритетні напрямки моніторингу та оцінки Цілей сталого розвитку на рівні територіальних громад. Дніпровський науковий часопис публічного управління, психології, права. 2024. Вип. 5. С. 79-84.
Горбата Л. П. Шляхи удосконалення комплексного механізму координації та моніторингу сталого розвитку на рівні територіальних громад. Таврійський науковий вісник. 2024. № 6. С. 14-22.
Ковалівська С. В. Цілі сталого розвитку як перспективний індикатор місцевого та регіонального розвитку. Тези доповіді. Національний інститут стратегічних досліджень. 2020. URL: https://niss.gov.ua/sites/default/files/2020-09/tezy-tsili-stalogo-rozvytku-1.pdf.
Патика Н.І., Булавка О.Г. Стратегічні орієнтири та пріоритетні напрями сталого розвитку сільських громад і територій в Україні в умовах децентралізації влади. Економіка АПК. 2021. № 8. С. 91-101.
Agenda 21. United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. URL: https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/Agenda21.pdf.
First Meeting of the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on the Sustainable Development Goal Indicators. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Statistics Division. 28 May 2015. URL: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/meetings/iaeg-sdgs-meeting-01/ESA-ST-AC.300-4%20-%20Process%20of%20selecting%20indicators.pdf.
OECD. A Territorial Approach to the Sustainable Development Goals: Synthesis report. OECD Urban Policy Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020. 226 p.
Voluntary Local Review of achievement of the sustainable development goals. Lviv, 2023. URL: https://sdglocalaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/ENG-Lviv-Voluntary-Local-Review.pdf
Varlamova M. L., Ishchuk Yu. A. (2023) Pidkhody do otsinky staloho rozvytku krain [Approaches to assessing the sustainable development of countries]. Modern Economics. no. 42. pp. 12-18.
Zaitseva L. O. (2020) Klasyfikatsiia indykatoriv otsinky staloho rozvytku [Classification of indicators for assessing sustainable development]. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V. I. Vernadskoho. Seriia: Ekonomika i upravlinnia – Scientific notes of V. I. Vernadsky TNU. Series: Economics and Management. vol. 31 (70). no 4. pp. 75-80.
Khaustova V. Ye., Omarov Sh. A. (2018) Kontseptsiia staloho rozvytku yak paradyhma rozvytku suspilstva [The concept of sustainable development as a paradigm of social development]. Problemy ekonomiky – Economic problems. no. 1 (35). pp. 265-273.
Koblianska I. H. (2023) Intehralna otsinka efektyvnosti ekoloho-ekonomichnykh protsesiv u rehionalnii ploshchyni z pozytsii staloho rozvytku [Integrated assessment of the effectiveness of ecological and economic processes at the regional level from the perspective of sustainable development]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and Society. no. 56. Available at: https://economyandsociety.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/2966
Stepanova O. V., Stepanova N. S. (2023) Metodychnyi pidkhid do vyznachennia systemy tsilei ta otsinky rivnia staloho rozvytku rehioniv [Methodological approach to defining a system of goals and assessing the level of sustainable development of regions]. BiznesInform – BusinessInform. no. 5. pp. 59-66.
Grijelmo M., Etxebarria M., Barona A., Rojo N., S´anchez-Fuente F. (2026) Sustainable Development Goals at regional level: Case study for enhancing performance assessment. Environmental Development. no. 57. 101355.
Kassymova S., Mustafayev K., Kabiyeva A. (2025) Development of an ecological-economic assessment system for the sustainable development of regions in Kazakhstan. Economics. no. 13(4), pp. 339-361.
Kauling M. F., Fernandes V., Limont M., Dziedzic M. (2025) Sustainable territorial development index for assessment of metropolitan regions. Sustainable Futures. no. 10. 101212.
Bai L., Chen Y., Cui Y., Feng C., Wu C., Ma B., Zhao W., Duan C., Wang W. (2025) Evaluating the Sustainable Development Level of Local Communities Within Hunan Nanshan National Park, China. Land. no. 14, 1749. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1749
Moschen S. A., Macke J., Bebber S., Benetti Correa da Silva M. (2019) Sustainable development of communities: ISO 37120 and UN goals. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. no. 20(5). pp. 887–900.
Huang R., Huang Q., Pradhan P., Wang Y., Hubacek K. (2025) Assessment of the sustainable development status of districts and counties in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration. Ecological Modelling. vol. 507. 111191. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304380025001760
Horbata L. P. (2024) Priorytetni napriamky monitorynhu ta otsinky Tsilei staloho rozvytku na rivni terytorialnykh hromad [Priority areas of monitoring and evaluation of Sustainable Development Goals at the level of territorial communities]. Dniprovskyi naukovyi chasopys publichnoho upravlinnia, psykholohii, prava – Dnipro Scientific Journal of Public Administration, Psychology, Law. vol. 5. pp. 79-84.
Horbata L. P. (2024) Shliakhy udoskonalennia kompleksnoho mekhanizmu koordynatsii ta monitorynhu staloho rozvytku na rivni terytorialnykh hromad [Ways to improve the comprehensive mechanism for coordination and monitoring of sustainable development at the level of territorial communities]. Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk – Tavria Scientific Bulletin. no. 6. pp. 14-22.
Kovalivska S. V. (2020) Tsili staloho rozvytku yak perspektyvnyi indykator mistsevoho ta rehionalnoho rozvytku. Tezy dopovidi. Natsionalnyi instytut stratehichnykh doslidzhen [Sustainable Development Goals as a promising indicator of local and regional development. Abstracts of the report. National Institute for Strategic Studies]. Available at: https://niss.gov.ua/sites/default/files/2020-09/tezy-tsili-stalogo-rozvytku-1.pdf
Patyka N.I., Bulavka O.H. (2021) Stratehichni oriientyry ta priorytetni napriamy staloho rozvytku silskykh hromad i terytorii v Ukraini v umovakh detsentralizatsii vlady [Strategic guidelines and priority areas of sustainable development of rural communities and territories in Ukraine in the context of decentralization of power]. Ekonomika APK – Economy of the Agricultural Complex. no. 8. pp. 91-101.
Agenda 21. United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/Agenda21.pdf
First Meeting of the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on the Sustainable Development Goal Indicators. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Statistics Division. 28 May 2015. Available at: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/meetings/iaeg-sdgs-meeting-01/ESA-ST-AC.300-4%20-%20Process%20of%20selecting%20indicators.pdf
OECD (2020) A Territorial Approach to the Sustainable Development Goals: Synthesis report. OECD Urban Policy Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Voluntary Local Review of achievement of the sustainable development goals. Lviv, 2023. Available at: https://sdglocalaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/ENG-Lviv-Voluntary-Local-Review.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Олег Діденко

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

